By PATRICK J. CROWLEY, Reformer Staff
Brattleboro Reformer
Wednesday, August 15
BELLOWS FALLS -- A bar owner here has
filed a federal lawsuit against the village, its police
department and Vermont State Police, stemming from his highly
publicized arrest last summer.
Wayne Ryan, owner of Nick's, a bar in
Bellows Falls, also named former Police Chief (and current
Windham County Sheriff) Keith Clark, along with the village of
Bellows Falls, Sgt. John Dunfee, the Vermont State Police and
Trooper Eric Vitali, asking for damages in a suit filed in U.S.
District Court.
The lawsuit was filed in Federal Court
in Rutland by Ryan's attorney, Alan P. Biederman, whose Rutland
law firm is also suing the Bellows Falls Police Department for
failing to comply with the Vermont Public Records Act --
Biederman requested dispatch logs for June 16 and 21, 2006. The
Bellows Falls Police Department continued to refuse to turn over
those records.
In Ryan's suit, Biederman said it comes
down to the fact that his client's constitutional rights were
stepped on. But he was sure to point out that this case is not
just about picking on cops.
"I have been police officer
representative most of my career and I'm suing these police
officers only because this was terrible police work," he said
Tuesday. "It's just not how it's supposed to be."
In one of six claims within the suit,
Biederman alleges that Clark, as police chief in Bellows Falls,
"expressly took action to ensure that a 'perp walk' photograph
or photographs would be taken of (Ryan) while he was in
custody."
The sole purpose of the publicity,
Biederman writes, "was to embarrass and humiliate" Ryan in
retaliation for his critical comments directed at the police
department leading up to an important budget vote.
In June last year, Vitali and Bellows
Falls police officer Christopher Brooks (who is not being sued),
were under cover when they showed up at Nick's to check for
underage drinkers. Ryan, checking identification at the door,
refused to let Vitali in when he failed to present ID.
Ryan eventually placed his hands on
Vitali's shoulders and "lightly pushed" him toward the door.
In later testimony, both officers said
the push was "directional" rather than confrontational. Both
left the bar, despite the fact that Brooks was allowed in,
because he had ID.
Vitali then reportedly took out his
handcuffs and was willing to have Ryan arrested for obstruction
of justice, a charge that Biederman said has no application in
the incident.
Brooks called his superior, Dunfee, who
arrived at the bar and told Ryan either he let the officers in
or he would close the bar. Being Alumni Weekend and a very busy
night at Nick's, the complaint says, closing would have meant a
big loss in revenue. The lawsuit also states that Dunfee would
have had no right under Vermont law to shut down the bar.
Five days later, Vitali returned to the
bar with several others from the state police to arrest Ryan for
impeding a public officer.
"The decision to arrest, rather than to
issue a citation to appear in court, was made to intimidate and
cause fear" with Ryan, the complaint reads. Vitali reportedly
contacted Brooks, who then notified Clark. Though Bellows Falls
police had nothing to do with the arrest, Clark reportedly
notified the Reformer of the state police's plans to
make the arrest.
The case against Ryan was thrown out by
Judge Katherine Hayes in May. In her written decision, she
states that the state's case does not show that Ryan broke any
law by not allowing Vitali into his business.
"The court concludes that these facts
are insufficient to meet the state's burden, and that the charge
against the defendant must therefore be dismissed," she wrote.
Still, she did not come to the complete
defense of Ryan, calling his actions "unnecessarily brusque, but
by no means abusive."
Additional claims within the suit
allege that police officers violated federal and state
legislation by failing to accommodate Ryan's two disabilities --
he is deaf and has a prosthetic leg.
"They refused to believe he was deaf,"
Biederman said.
"Trooper Vitali and Defendant Vermont
State Police made no accommodation whatsoever on account of
(Ryan's) disability to provide any means of communication by
which police officers might effectively communicate to (Ryan)
what was occurring during the arrest, transport or booking
process," the lawsuit reads.
Biederman said he obtained video from
state police showing officers speaking to Ryan with their backs
turned to him. Ryan can read lips to a certain extent. At some
points during his processing, an officer wrote notes on paper to
communicate to Ryan. They also made Ryan's son, who is able to
communicate with his father, sit in the waiting room at the
police barracks in Rockingham.
"This is just an unfortunate case where
it could have been handled very easily," Biederman said.
Ryan's suit is asking for a jury trial.
Biederman said from this point, the defendants will have an
opportunity to respond to the complaint, presumably by denying
it. After that, the case will go into discovery. He added that
civil cases in federal courts vary on how long they take.
Both Clark and Dunfee declined comment
for this report. Other defendants contacted did not return phone
calls.
Patrick J. Crowley can be reached
at
pcrowley@reformer.com,
or 802-254-2311, ext. 277. |